Abstract
This paper begins with an ethnographically self-reflective analysis triggered by a social scientist addressing the presenter (me) as a boundary object. I was at the time translating and facilitating interaction between Yolngu Indigenous Australian landowners in East Arnhemland in the Northern Territory, and practitioners of Western scientific knowledges—both natural scientists (hydrologists) and social scientists. We are all participants in a current Australian Research Council project – ‘Cross-cultural management of freshwater in the Milingimbi community’ http://groundup.cdu.edu.au/index.php/cross-cultural-management-of-freshwater-on-resource-constrained-islands-arc-linkage/
This story is a case study to empirically and intellectually situate the presenter (me) as a boundary object – an ‘object’ that mediates between two knowledge communities. Then I highlight a core Yolngu epistemic practice, introducing gurrutu (kinship) in which everyone and everything is a boundary object by virtue of being a relation. An allegory galimindirrk (brackish water) - a favoured Yolngu metaphor re-presenting the idea of joining differing life-sources, will exhibit how Yolngu do differences together within a collective matrix of boundary objects. I will then explore what STS academics might learn from the Yolngu epistemic enactments in everyday and ceremonial contexts. I hope this might lead academics to reconsider boundary objects in new and different ways when thinking about the movements of knowledge.
This story is a case study to empirically and intellectually situate the presenter (me) as a boundary object – an ‘object’ that mediates between two knowledge communities. Then I highlight a core Yolngu epistemic practice, introducing gurrutu (kinship) in which everyone and everything is a boundary object by virtue of being a relation. An allegory galimindirrk (brackish water) - a favoured Yolngu metaphor re-presenting the idea of joining differing life-sources, will exhibit how Yolngu do differences together within a collective matrix of boundary objects. I will then explore what STS academics might learn from the Yolngu epistemic enactments in everyday and ceremonial contexts. I hope this might lead academics to reconsider boundary objects in new and different ways when thinking about the movements of knowledge.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Publication status | Published - 2018 |
Event | Society for Social Studies of Science Annual Conference - International Convention Centre, Sydney, Australia Duration: 29 Aug 2018 → 31 Aug 2018 https://4s2018sydney.org/ |
Conference
Conference | Society for Social Studies of Science Annual Conference |
---|---|
Abbreviated title | 4S Sydney |
Country/Territory | Australia |
City | Sydney |
Period | 29/08/18 → 31/08/18 |
Internet address |