White interference, bad collaborations and new norms in Indigenous art: Can intellectual property law reforms fix this?

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    84 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Indigenous art has had longstanding issues with Australian copyright law, including the issue of collaborations in Indigenous art. In 2023, a related issue concerning allegations of ?white interference? surfaced. Those allegations highlighted the problem of forming ethical collaborations in the Indigenous arts industry relying on existing law. Partnerships between Indigenous and non-Indigenous people to produce art have also been validly made leading to collaborations known as the ?new norm'. This article explores white interference, bad collaborations, and new norms in Indigenous art. It analyses existing legal protections and those proposed by IP Australia, the Productivity Commission, and a Parliamentary Standing Committee aimed at protecting communal Indigenous Knowledge and the rights of Indigenous artists.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)55 - 61
    Number of pages7
    JournalAlternative Law Journal
    Volume49
    Issue number1
    Early online date2023
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Mar 2024

    Bibliographical note

    doi: 10.1177/1037969X231217302

    Publisher Copyright:
    © The Author(s) 2023.

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'White interference, bad collaborations and new norms in Indigenous art: Can intellectual property law reforms fix this?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this