Whose backyard? Some precautions in choosing recipient sites for assisted colonisation of Australian plants and animals

Stephen Harris, Sophie Arnall, Margaret Byrne, David Coates, Matt W Hayward, Tara Martin, Nicola Mitchell, Stephen Garnett

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

    Abstract

    In cases where assisted colonisation is the appropriate conservation tool, the selection of recipient sites is a major challenge. Here, we propose a framework for site selection that can be applied to the Australian biota, where planning for assisted colonisation is in its infancy. Characteristics that will be important drivers in the decision-making process include the size of a recipient site, the potential to augment corridors and respond to niche gaps, the maximisation of climatic buffering, bioregional similarity, tenure security, and the minimisation of opportunities for hybridisation and invasiveness. Sites we suggest be precluded from assisted colonisation include sites of high species endemism, IUCN category 1 reference reserves and fully-functioning threatened ecological communities.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)106-111
    Number of pages6
    JournalEcological Management and Restoration
    Volume14
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - May 2013

    Fingerprint

    infancy
    decision making
    niches
    indigenous species
    hybridization
    colonization
    planning
    animal
    organisms
    animals
    invasiveness
    endemism
    site selection
    buffering
    biota
    niche

    Cite this

    Harris, Stephen ; Arnall, Sophie ; Byrne, Margaret ; Coates, David ; Hayward, Matt W ; Martin, Tara ; Mitchell, Nicola ; Garnett, Stephen. / Whose backyard? Some precautions in choosing recipient sites for assisted colonisation of Australian plants and animals. In: Ecological Management and Restoration. 2013 ; Vol. 14, No. 2. pp. 106-111.
    @article{ce73a7f9455f46f8a247ced4654569b9,
    title = "Whose backyard? Some precautions in choosing recipient sites for assisted colonisation of Australian plants and animals",
    abstract = "In cases where assisted colonisation is the appropriate conservation tool, the selection of recipient sites is a major challenge. Here, we propose a framework for site selection that can be applied to the Australian biota, where planning for assisted colonisation is in its infancy. Characteristics that will be important drivers in the decision-making process include the size of a recipient site, the potential to augment corridors and respond to niche gaps, the maximisation of climatic buffering, bioregional similarity, tenure security, and the minimisation of opportunities for hybridisation and invasiveness. Sites we suggest be precluded from assisted colonisation include sites of high species endemism, IUCN category 1 reference reserves and fully-functioning threatened ecological communities.",
    keywords = "adaptive management, animal, climate change, colonization, decision making, endemism, habitat conservation, habitat corridor, plant, Red List, site selection, translocation, Australia, Animalia",
    author = "Stephen Harris and Sophie Arnall and Margaret Byrne and David Coates and Hayward, {Matt W} and Tara Martin and Nicola Mitchell and Stephen Garnett",
    year = "2013",
    month = "5",
    doi = "10.1111/emr.12041",
    language = "English",
    volume = "14",
    pages = "106--111",
    journal = "Ecological Management and Restoration",
    issn = "1442-7001",
    publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
    number = "2",

    }

    Whose backyard? Some precautions in choosing recipient sites for assisted colonisation of Australian plants and animals. / Harris, Stephen; Arnall, Sophie; Byrne, Margaret; Coates, David; Hayward, Matt W; Martin, Tara; Mitchell, Nicola; Garnett, Stephen.

    In: Ecological Management and Restoration, Vol. 14, No. 2, 05.2013, p. 106-111.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Whose backyard? Some precautions in choosing recipient sites for assisted colonisation of Australian plants and animals

    AU - Harris, Stephen

    AU - Arnall, Sophie

    AU - Byrne, Margaret

    AU - Coates, David

    AU - Hayward, Matt W

    AU - Martin, Tara

    AU - Mitchell, Nicola

    AU - Garnett, Stephen

    PY - 2013/5

    Y1 - 2013/5

    N2 - In cases where assisted colonisation is the appropriate conservation tool, the selection of recipient sites is a major challenge. Here, we propose a framework for site selection that can be applied to the Australian biota, where planning for assisted colonisation is in its infancy. Characteristics that will be important drivers in the decision-making process include the size of a recipient site, the potential to augment corridors and respond to niche gaps, the maximisation of climatic buffering, bioregional similarity, tenure security, and the minimisation of opportunities for hybridisation and invasiveness. Sites we suggest be precluded from assisted colonisation include sites of high species endemism, IUCN category 1 reference reserves and fully-functioning threatened ecological communities.

    AB - In cases where assisted colonisation is the appropriate conservation tool, the selection of recipient sites is a major challenge. Here, we propose a framework for site selection that can be applied to the Australian biota, where planning for assisted colonisation is in its infancy. Characteristics that will be important drivers in the decision-making process include the size of a recipient site, the potential to augment corridors and respond to niche gaps, the maximisation of climatic buffering, bioregional similarity, tenure security, and the minimisation of opportunities for hybridisation and invasiveness. Sites we suggest be precluded from assisted colonisation include sites of high species endemism, IUCN category 1 reference reserves and fully-functioning threatened ecological communities.

    KW - adaptive management

    KW - animal

    KW - climate change

    KW - colonization

    KW - decision making

    KW - endemism

    KW - habitat conservation

    KW - habitat corridor

    KW - plant

    KW - Red List

    KW - site selection

    KW - translocation

    KW - Australia

    KW - Animalia

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84878354421&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1111/emr.12041

    DO - 10.1111/emr.12041

    M3 - Article

    VL - 14

    SP - 106

    EP - 111

    JO - Ecological Management and Restoration

    JF - Ecological Management and Restoration

    SN - 1442-7001

    IS - 2

    ER -