TY - JOUR
T1 - Wings of tropical finches
T2 - Interspecific differences in shape are consistent with levels of mobility, but moult and feather fault patterns are more complex
AU - Franklin, Donald C.
AU - Legge, Sarah
AU - Skroblin, Anja
AU - Heathcote, Joanne
AU - Maute, Kimberly
AU - Schaefer, Douglas J.
AU - Garnett, Stephen T.
PY - 2017/10/2
Y1 - 2017/10/2
N2 - Birds’ wings reflect their life histories, suggesting evolutionary selection for wing shapes and moult strategies. Compared to sedentary species, long-distance migrants have narrower wings (for fast, efficient flight); they have fewer feather faults and avoid moulting flight feathers during migration (to optimise flight surface performance). It is unclear whether these patterns apply to species that fly short-intermediate distances, like tropical nomads. We compared wing shape, feather faulting, and flight-feather moult across five finch species from northern Australia with varying mobility: Pictorella Mannikins (Heteromunia pectoralis) and Gouldian Finches (Erythrura gouldiae) are highly mobile, nomadic at regional scales; Long-tailed Finches (Poephila acuticauda) and Double-barred Finches (Taeniopygia bichenovii) are sedentary with local nomadism; Crimson Finches (Neochmia phaeton) are sedentary. More mobile species had narrower wings and higher wing loading than relatively sedentary species, and less feather faulting. Variation in moult strategies was complex, but mobile species carried out moult fast, in a short time window, and moulted a single feather at a time. Unexpectedly, Gouldian Finch wings were more suited for fast efficient flight than Pictorella Mannikin wings, and yet they had more feather faulting. Differences in mobility may be a key dimension of niche separation that allows these species to co-exist.
AB - Birds’ wings reflect their life histories, suggesting evolutionary selection for wing shapes and moult strategies. Compared to sedentary species, long-distance migrants have narrower wings (for fast, efficient flight); they have fewer feather faults and avoid moulting flight feathers during migration (to optimise flight surface performance). It is unclear whether these patterns apply to species that fly short-intermediate distances, like tropical nomads. We compared wing shape, feather faulting, and flight-feather moult across five finch species from northern Australia with varying mobility: Pictorella Mannikins (Heteromunia pectoralis) and Gouldian Finches (Erythrura gouldiae) are highly mobile, nomadic at regional scales; Long-tailed Finches (Poephila acuticauda) and Double-barred Finches (Taeniopygia bichenovii) are sedentary with local nomadism; Crimson Finches (Neochmia phaeton) are sedentary. More mobile species had narrower wings and higher wing loading than relatively sedentary species, and less feather faulting. Variation in moult strategies was complex, but mobile species carried out moult fast, in a short time window, and moulted a single feather at a time. Unexpectedly, Gouldian Finch wings were more suited for fast efficient flight than Pictorella Mannikin wings, and yet they had more feather faulting. Differences in mobility may be a key dimension of niche separation that allows these species to co-exist.
KW - Feather fault
KW - Gouldian Finch
KW - moult strategy
KW - nomadic bird
KW - tropical savannah
KW - wing shape
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85052892215&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/01584197.2017.1361790
DO - 10.1080/01584197.2017.1361790
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85052892215
SN - 1448-5540
VL - 117
SP - 370
EP - 381
JO - Emu: austral ornithology
JF - Emu: austral ornithology
IS - 4
ER -