Women from refugee backgrounds and their experiences of attending a specialist antenatal clinic. Narratives from an Australian setting

Helen Stapleton, Rebecca Murphy, Ignacio Correa-Velez, Michelle Steel, Sue Kildea

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Problem: In response to an identified need, a specialist antenatal clinic for women from refugee backgrounds was introduced in 2008, with an evaluation planned and completed in 2010. 

Question: Can maternity care experiences for women from refugee backgrounds, attending a specialist antenatal clinic in a tertiary Australian public hospital, be improved? 

Methods: The evaluation employed mixed methods, generating qualitative and quantitative data from two hospital databases, a chart audit, surveys and interviews with service users, providers and stakeholders. Contributions were received from 202 participants. 

Findings: The clinic was highly regarded by all participants. Continuity of care throughout the antenatal period was particularly valued by newly arrived women as it afforded them security and support to negotiate an unfamiliar Western maternity system. Positive experiences decreased however; as women transitioned from the clinic to labour and postnatal wards where they reported that their traditional birthing and recuperative practices were often interrupted by the imposition of Western biomedical notions of appropriate care. The centrally located clinic was problematic, frequently requiring complex travel arrangements. Appointment schedules often impacted negatively on traditional spousal and family obligations. 

Conclusions: Providing comprehensive and culturally responsive maternity care for women from refugee backgrounds is achievable, however it is also resource intensive. The production of translated information which is high quality in terms of production and content, whilst also taking account of languages which are only rarely encountered, is problematic. Cultural competency programmes for staff, ideally online, require regular updating in light of new knowledge and changing political sensitivities.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)260-266
Number of pages7
JournalWomen and Birth
Volume26
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Refugees
Cultural Competency
Continuity of Patient Care
Public Hospitals
Appointments and Schedules
Language
Databases
Interviews

Cite this

Stapleton, Helen ; Murphy, Rebecca ; Correa-Velez, Ignacio ; Steel, Michelle ; Kildea, Sue. / Women from refugee backgrounds and their experiences of attending a specialist antenatal clinic. Narratives from an Australian setting. In: Women and Birth. 2013 ; Vol. 26, No. 4. pp. 260-266.
@article{eb36f5ccf39a41fcb6b2caeec44a1f27,
title = "Women from refugee backgrounds and their experiences of attending a specialist antenatal clinic. Narratives from an Australian setting",
abstract = "Problem: In response to an identified need, a specialist antenatal clinic for women from refugee backgrounds was introduced in 2008, with an evaluation planned and completed in 2010. Question: Can maternity care experiences for women from refugee backgrounds, attending a specialist antenatal clinic in a tertiary Australian public hospital, be improved? Methods: The evaluation employed mixed methods, generating qualitative and quantitative data from two hospital databases, a chart audit, surveys and interviews with service users, providers and stakeholders. Contributions were received from 202 participants. Findings: The clinic was highly regarded by all participants. Continuity of care throughout the antenatal period was particularly valued by newly arrived women as it afforded them security and support to negotiate an unfamiliar Western maternity system. Positive experiences decreased however; as women transitioned from the clinic to labour and postnatal wards where they reported that their traditional birthing and recuperative practices were often interrupted by the imposition of Western biomedical notions of appropriate care. The centrally located clinic was problematic, frequently requiring complex travel arrangements. Appointment schedules often impacted negatively on traditional spousal and family obligations. Conclusions: Providing comprehensive and culturally responsive maternity care for women from refugee backgrounds is achievable, however it is also resource intensive. The production of translated information which is high quality in terms of production and content, whilst also taking account of languages which are only rarely encountered, is problematic. Cultural competency programmes for staff, ideally online, require regular updating in light of new knowledge and changing political sensitivities.",
keywords = "Cultural, Evaluation (MeSH), Interpreter, Midwifery (MeSH), Refugees (MeSH)",
author = "Helen Stapleton and Rebecca Murphy and Ignacio Correa-Velez and Michelle Steel and Sue Kildea",
year = "2013",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1016/j.wombi.2013.07.004",
language = "English",
volume = "26",
pages = "260--266",
journal = "Women and Birth",
issn = "1871-5192",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "4",

}

Women from refugee backgrounds and their experiences of attending a specialist antenatal clinic. Narratives from an Australian setting. / Stapleton, Helen; Murphy, Rebecca; Correa-Velez, Ignacio; Steel, Michelle; Kildea, Sue.

In: Women and Birth, Vol. 26, No. 4, 12.2013, p. 260-266.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Women from refugee backgrounds and their experiences of attending a specialist antenatal clinic. Narratives from an Australian setting

AU - Stapleton, Helen

AU - Murphy, Rebecca

AU - Correa-Velez, Ignacio

AU - Steel, Michelle

AU - Kildea, Sue

PY - 2013/12

Y1 - 2013/12

N2 - Problem: In response to an identified need, a specialist antenatal clinic for women from refugee backgrounds was introduced in 2008, with an evaluation planned and completed in 2010. Question: Can maternity care experiences for women from refugee backgrounds, attending a specialist antenatal clinic in a tertiary Australian public hospital, be improved? Methods: The evaluation employed mixed methods, generating qualitative and quantitative data from two hospital databases, a chart audit, surveys and interviews with service users, providers and stakeholders. Contributions were received from 202 participants. Findings: The clinic was highly regarded by all participants. Continuity of care throughout the antenatal period was particularly valued by newly arrived women as it afforded them security and support to negotiate an unfamiliar Western maternity system. Positive experiences decreased however; as women transitioned from the clinic to labour and postnatal wards where they reported that their traditional birthing and recuperative practices were often interrupted by the imposition of Western biomedical notions of appropriate care. The centrally located clinic was problematic, frequently requiring complex travel arrangements. Appointment schedules often impacted negatively on traditional spousal and family obligations. Conclusions: Providing comprehensive and culturally responsive maternity care for women from refugee backgrounds is achievable, however it is also resource intensive. The production of translated information which is high quality in terms of production and content, whilst also taking account of languages which are only rarely encountered, is problematic. Cultural competency programmes for staff, ideally online, require regular updating in light of new knowledge and changing political sensitivities.

AB - Problem: In response to an identified need, a specialist antenatal clinic for women from refugee backgrounds was introduced in 2008, with an evaluation planned and completed in 2010. Question: Can maternity care experiences for women from refugee backgrounds, attending a specialist antenatal clinic in a tertiary Australian public hospital, be improved? Methods: The evaluation employed mixed methods, generating qualitative and quantitative data from two hospital databases, a chart audit, surveys and interviews with service users, providers and stakeholders. Contributions were received from 202 participants. Findings: The clinic was highly regarded by all participants. Continuity of care throughout the antenatal period was particularly valued by newly arrived women as it afforded them security and support to negotiate an unfamiliar Western maternity system. Positive experiences decreased however; as women transitioned from the clinic to labour and postnatal wards where they reported that their traditional birthing and recuperative practices were often interrupted by the imposition of Western biomedical notions of appropriate care. The centrally located clinic was problematic, frequently requiring complex travel arrangements. Appointment schedules often impacted negatively on traditional spousal and family obligations. Conclusions: Providing comprehensive and culturally responsive maternity care for women from refugee backgrounds is achievable, however it is also resource intensive. The production of translated information which is high quality in terms of production and content, whilst also taking account of languages which are only rarely encountered, is problematic. Cultural competency programmes for staff, ideally online, require regular updating in light of new knowledge and changing political sensitivities.

KW - Cultural

KW - Evaluation (MeSH)

KW - Interpreter

KW - Midwifery (MeSH)

KW - Refugees (MeSH)

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84888339551&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.wombi.2013.07.004

DO - 10.1016/j.wombi.2013.07.004

M3 - Article

VL - 26

SP - 260

EP - 266

JO - Women and Birth

JF - Women and Birth

SN - 1871-5192

IS - 4

ER -